Posted by Lucy Peters on August 23, 2008 at 15:15 [84.201.164.32]
In Reply to: Ageplaying as regression? posted by Asuka on August 21, 2008 at 10:39
And I thought I was the only LG who didn't want to mix ageplay with sex! For me, too, assuming my LG personna is a form of escape, a step back from the real world to one where adult concerns are somebody else's business. And yes, it's most definitely a form of (temporary) regression.
When I'm happily regressed to LG mode, I can shed all the trappings of being a not-terribly-successful girl-about-town and just be little ME again: hair in bunches, no make-up, simple childish clothes not designer labels; I want to look cute and innocent, definitely *not* sexy. Dressing as a LG fosters this illusion (or is it self-delusion?)
And yes, I do quite like to wear nappies – but only sometimes, mostly for bed. (Proper old-fashioned fluffy white terry-towel nappies held with big pink pins, not environmentally-disastrous disposables.) Soft clear-vinyl plastic pants have instant LG appeal, as do thick-cotton or terry nursey-print trainer pants. But most of the time I'm happy to wear ordinary LG-style white-with-a-picture cotton panties.
Most of all, though, I want to be able to do all those self-indulgent LG things: suck my thumb, play around all day, sleep in the afternoon, cuddle my somewhat-threadbare teddy-bear and unconcernedly go potty in my pants.
I quite like the idea of having a 'Daddy' who would look after me, although I'm not sure how I'd react having a man bath me or change my nappy and clean me up after I'd messed my pants. Probably, it would be OK if he was old enough to *be* my Daddy. I don't think I could contemplate a 'Daddy' anywhere near my own age. Come to think of it, a Mummy would be just as nice (I never had much of either when I *was* a little girl).
But sex with 'Daddy?' I don't think so. There's a very different Lucy who is quite happy to romp in the sack with some suitable male (alas, a rare and endangered species); but that Lucy has very little to do with LG Lucy - except that I have found that some guys find a touch of the 'LG look" a bit of a turn-on. That can be a help when you're as bereft of womanly curves as I am!
As for ageplay being a 'Fetish' - I'm not quite sure that holds true when there's no sexual aspect. Wikipedia defines a fetish as: 'The sexual attraction to materials and objects not conventionally viewed as being sexual in nature'. So I suppose guys being turned on by the 'LG look' is a form of fetish; same goes for people who get excited by nappies and rubber pants per se, rather than as part of role-play.
I don't regard myself as a fetishist in any way when I'm in my LG role. It's pure escapism for the most part, although I do find the act of wetting or, especially, pooing my pants highly pleasurable in an odd sort of way that maybe does have an erotic element to it. But I've always enjoyed these feelings of going potty in my pants, ever since I can remember. I did it regularly and constantly thoughout my childhood, much to the chagrin of a succession of nannies and au-pairs!
One thing is certain, and that is that this is a complex area of human psychology with many layers and aspects, and that different people come at the whole ageplay/roleplay/regression thing from a very different angle to me. I'm just an old-fashioned girl who likes to suck her thumb and feel something warm and squishy in her underwear!
Love,
Lucy
Email: lucypee4@gmail.com