Posted by GentleDad on February 12, 2010 at 11:23 [174.54.32.108]
In Reply to: Daddys posted by bunnybottoms on February 12, 2010 at 09:37
Bunny,
A while ago you and I chatted for a bit as potential daddy and girl. The chat ended quickly, as I did not have enough experience to meet your requirements. Here are some observations about our chat. I was expansive and detailed about what my ideal girl would be like. You took offense to this, as you saw it as a list of expectations that it would be your job to fulfill. If you see it that way, then you are quite right to be offended, as it leaves little opportunity for yourself. You make this point in your current post. And you made a post at the time complaining about daddies who seem to be in love with their own fantasies. I recognized myself, and apologized. You ackowledged that with happiness, and that was a nice thing. But I did not see my thoughts about the things I like in a babygirl as being a list of demands. I see it as placing stars in an unlit sky. I put my stars out in the way that I like. I expected that you would do the same. We then look at our two skies, and if many of our brightest stars are in similar spots, well, then we have something to talk about! You did not like where I put my stars, but you never said where you would put your stars. I might have been interested.
I told you about some of my business endeavors. You said that you also had some “lucrative hobbies”, but you never said what they were. I might have been interested.
I talked about my educational experiences, and you described yourself as being “very high IQ”, but you never told me of any of your achievements. I might have been interested.
So, as to your question if it is you and the way you approach things, I think the answer is “Very possibly.” If you do not want to be seen as a robot, then be seen as a person.
Another help would be to type your posts in your word processor first and run your spell and grammar check on them.
Sincerely,