Posted by Skeptic lurker on May 29, 2002 at 00:01
In Reply to: Why the Anger at My Postings? posted by Napoleonlll on May 28, 2002 at 06:38
Napoleon,
I don't usually post here, but I visit this board very regularly. In the past I have congratulated you and Maculatus for your efforts.
The postings you see --I mean ANY postings-- come from people whose desire to post has exceeded a certain threshold. I'd be willing to bet that a lot more people visit this board than the number of persons who post. (I presume that wetset could corroborate this claim since its servers are aware of each visitor's IP address, so it would be easy to calculate the percentage of visitors who post.) Therefore, could it be that those angry postings come from a MINORITY? I think that most visitors may read your postings, perhaps follow the links you provide, and then move on without posting a response. That does NOT mean they would like your postings to go away! (I certainly don't!)
Personally, I find your postings very interesting. While I do think that most of the pics are not evidence of wettings, I remember quite a few of them which merited further investigation. For example, in some of the pics showing Britney at a party (I don't remember which party) accompanied by her boyfrined, she is wearing a dress which she is seemingly trying to keep away from her panties. I saw this in several photographs from that party. Although there were no visble wet patches, the apparent persistence with which Britney is keeping the front of her dress away from her panties (she is shown with both hands in her pockets in several photographs) makes one believe that she did have a worrisome leak into her panties.
In short, Napoleon, I think you are doing an excellent job. As others have remarked, Britney is probably employing an experienced PR team, which would almost certainly try to prevent any photographs showing her wet from reaching the media. Therefore, catching this celebrity wet will require a lot of perseverance. Please don't go away!