Response to the democratic loyalists



[ Hot Wet Photosets ] [ Join Paysite ] [ Return To Main Board ] [ WSP Home Page ]

Posted by Chris Choo on January 24, 2000 at 20:40

Hello once again democratic loyalists. I have decided to respond not because of the democracies but of a communist by the name of John Lee. I have read over all the responses by the democratic loyalists. Many of the posts were just bunch of trash. A one sentence response shows how lazy many people are to type. I got some responses of people calling me a facist. Facist is not communism for those who don't know. Lionheart, do you call your congressmen because you think North Korea is a threat or is it to ensure the United States global dominance? I bet it is to ensure your countries status remain at the top. Ralph, another American guy. "Nuke em". That's the first thing Americans say when there is a threat to their dominance. Nuke those Iraqi's. Nuke those Iranians. Oh and it will not be as easy as you think to destroy North Korea. Remember we have underground facilities just in case the Americans mention "Nuke em". You just go back to your fantasies. As long as your not the one who is in front of your army to attack. Wouldn't want you to pee in your pants of fear of hearing a balloon pop in the battlefield. Sky Mouse, I am not a criminal to be looking up my domain name. The rest of the responses by democratic loyalists I will not argue because they are plain trash. John Lee, what is the difference between communism in China and North Korea? It is still communism. I never said that communism was against freedom. I only talked about how democratic societies provide too much freedom. In your terms provide too much "autonomy" to it's societies. Communism does have freedom. I never mentioned saying communism didn't have freedom. Granting autonomous status to regions within a country is not correct. You mentioned when needed it is correct to grant "autonomy" to regions within a country. I don't think it is necessary to grant autonomy to any region in a country. Granting autonomy to a region means that the region is against the government and that means disobedience towards the government. Autonomy is not good because it is a form of trying to seperate from the rest of the country. That's why autonomy shouldn't be allowed in any communist country. All regions and all states in a country should be totally loyalists to their communist governments and shouldn't be allowed to declare a self-governing status. So I never said communism was against freedom but I don't find freedom necessary or correct for any state or region in a communist country. What I would like to know is why you are using Karl Marx to represent communism? What country did Karl Marx turn communist? Communist Red Hand Society? What is that for? CRHS?

Communists, fight the democracies!
Proud North Korean




Email: chris@choo.com


Replies :



[ Hot Wet Photosets ] [ Join Paysite ] [ Return To Main Board ] [ WSP Home Page ]